Why does global warming not exist

Peter Stott , the head of climate monitoring at the U. Much work has already been done to understand the cause of the slowdown. Some research has tied it to a series of small volcanic eruptions around the globe while other findings have linked it to the changes in winds and ocean circulation.

Stott said the Met Office is also refining its estimate of the global temperature and that the new analysis is within the range of uncertainty the Met Office agency includes in its analysis. Researching and reporting the science and impacts of climate change. Who We Are An independent organization of leading scientists and journalists researching and reporting the facts about our changing climate and its impact on the public.

What We Do Climate Central surveys and conducts scientific research on climate change and informs the public of key findings. About Our Expertise Members of the Climate Central staff and board are among the most respected leaders in climate science.

If you push at exactly the same frequency of oscillation as the swing is swinging, the amplitude of the swing will increase. You tune radio and television receivers to resonate at whatever frequency your preferred station is transmitting. Your cellphone is tuned to resonate with the different frequencies of transmission and reception used at a local cell tower.

Individual hair cells, called cilia, in the cochlea of your ears, resonate with sounds in air, sending signals to your brain, allowing you to hear very low frequencies typically from 20 to 20, cycles per second. Visible colors, which are frequencies of oscillation between and trillion cycles per second, resonate with cells in the cones of your eyes that send signals to your brain, allowing you to see ten million different colors.

Visible light is visible because these are the natural frequencies of oscillation that the cells in your eyes oscillate at, given their physical size. For centuries, scientists have argued whether light, in the form of electromagnetic radiation, travels through space as waves or as particles. Waves and particles, however, describe how the energies of motion of physical pieces of matter are visualized as traveling.

But light is not physical matter and light cannot be observed until it interacts with physical matter. Light, electromagnetic radiation, is observed to be a broad continuum of frequencies of oscillation where amplitudes of oscillation are observed to travel simultaneously at each frequency of oscillation by resonance.

Conduction is resonance enabled by physical contact of molecules of matter. Radiation is resonance enabled by the interaction of what we think of as electric and magnetic fields via line of sight where what we think of as the velocity of light is proportional to the very short and constant time required for resonance to occur over any distance.

Frequency of oscillation is observed not to change with distance, even over galactic distances, except for Doppler effects where the source and receiver are moving relative to each other.

Similarly, amplitude of oscillation is not observed to change with distance. Thus, the Planck temperature of radiation from Sun is the same close to Sun as it is close to Earth. But the thermal effect of solar radiation is observed to decrease with the square of the distance. What appears to be happening is that the density of molecular-scale bonds on the surface of matter that resonate decreases with distance, so that the amplitude increase due to resonance must be shared with increasing numbers of bonds that are not resonating with bonds on the distant source.

Resonance is explained in more detail in video 9. Another key property of resonance is that the absorbing oscillator, in an undamped system, may oscillate at an amplitude much greater than the average between the emitter and the absorber. This explains why oxygen molecules are dissociated most efficiently at frequencies of oscillation close to terahertz and not at higher frequencies.

This also explains the spectral lines of absorption by carbon dioxide discussed below that are thought to be the resonant frequencies of all the bonds that hold matter together. We still have a lot to learn about resonance, but we first have to realize how important it is for the flow of heat. According to the well-accepted Planck-Einstein relation, each frequency has its own energy. Therefore, energy radiated by a body of matter is a continuum of energies where all energies coexist.

It makes no physical sense to integrate across these frequencies or energies to calculate a single number of watts per square meter. This approach seems to have worked adequately for most engineering applications where temperature differences are small. It fails catastrophically, however, for large differences in temperatures such as between Sun at o C and Earth at 15 o C.

Temperature and heat are not additive. They are averative because heat flows by resonance. Water is, by far, the strongest absorber, especially at lower frequencies. Within these narrow frequency bands, what is being absorbed is only narrow spectral lines of oscillation shown in red in the diagram on the left. These spectral lines turn out to be the resonant frequencies of all the overtones of oscillation, of all the normal modes of oscillation or all the bonds holding the molecules together.

Radiant energy is absorbed into the bonds, which has no direct effect on the temperature of the gas. Temperature of a gas is proportional to the average kinetic energy of translation of all atoms and molecules making up air. One has to assume that the absorbed oscillatory energy is converted by collisions into translational kinetic energy, a process that does not appear to be efficient. These vertical black lines show frequencies and relative amplitudes only.

Their absolute amplitudes on this plot are arbitrary. A molecule of carbon dioxide cannot physically emit black-body radiation. It can only emit the spectral lines that it absorbed into its bonds. When these limited spectral lines are absorbed by any body of matter, they would have minuscule effect on temperature of that body of matter because they only make up a very small part of the continuum of frequencies whose amplitudes of oscillation must be increased in order to warm a body of matter.

Radiation by resonance is observed only to flow from a hotter body of matter to a cooler body of matter, which at the molecular-bond scale is from a higher amplitude of oscillation to a lower amplitude of oscillation at the same frequency.

Any increase in energy resulting from absorption by carbon dioxide, must be shared with other molecules and atoms. My experiments show that increasing carbon dioxide concentrations by a factor of more than 23 has no measurable effect on air temperature. Experiments reported on Internet that claim to see greenhouse warming utilize heat sources that are much, much hotter than Earth. More information at JustProveCO2. Greenhouse warming theory depends on at least nine assumptions that appear to be mistaken.

Greenhouse warming theory has never been shown to be physically possible by experiment, a cornerstone of the scientific method. But more importantly what is the significance of these signatures? The majority of signatures are engineers 10, Without formal training in climate science the level of understanding remains unknown among those that signed the petition. A key question is not how many of those that signed the petition know climate physics in sufficient depth, but rather how many of those that signed the petition work directly in the field of climate science.

But there is no indication how many work in the field of climate science? What is notable is that the polls indicate there is a perspective difference between working climate scientists and scientists not working in the field of climate. When one examines the experts in the field, one sees a significant divergence from the general view.

So the more important question for us is, what do 'expert' climate scientists think? When compared with pres levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?

Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures? Source: Pew Research Center. Changing scientific opinion In the Gallup organization conducted a telephone survey on global climate change among scientists drawn from membership lists of the American Meteorological Association and the American Geophysical Union.

We repeated several of their questions verbatim, in order to measure changes in scientific opinion over time. The Arctic is warming roughly twice as fast as the rest of the world, causing sea ice to melt earlier and form later each year. This makes it more difficult for female polar bears to get onto land in late autumn to build their dens, and more difficult for them to get out onto the sea ice in spring to feed their cubs. Their main source of prey, seals, are also affected by climate change, as they depend on sea ice to raise their young.

This means that in some parts of the Arctic, polar bears are having to survive with less food than they did previously. The majority of UK homes get their electricity from the National Grid. This one isn't a myth, Darwin got the adaptation part right. To survive, plants, animals and birds confronted with climate change have two options: move or adapt.

There are several examples of species that have begun to adapt to climate change already. But increasingly, it's a different story for many. And, as habitats are destroyed by roads, cities and dams, moving becomes increasingly difficult. This, we firmly believe, is wrong.

It's WWF's mission to build a world where people and nature thrive together. What's now needed is for political and business leaders to take bold and urgent action towards using these solutions to address the climate crisis and restore nature. Despite being one of the largest emitters of greenhouse gases, China is currently one of the largest investors in renewables. The increase in investment has been in response to the rapid growth of green business and the need to clean up air pollution in its major cities.

Climate change is a global issue and we all have a responsibility to step up to the climate crisis. Action on it will need serious investment but has the potential to deliver huge benefits for nature and people.