What is the difference between democratic and totalitarian

In addition to elections, democracies ideally have a public sphere in which citizens can debate and deliberate about matters of public concern. Out of this deliberation process comes public opinion, which ideally influences the votes of representatives.

In contrast to democracy, in totalitarian systems the will of the leader is supreme. This does not necessarily mean that totalitarian dictatorships do not have any legal system at all.

Another important principle of democracy is that the rights of minorities are to be protected. As the legal theorist Hans Kelsen observed, democracies make decisions through majority rule. Majority rule logically entails the existence of not only a majority but a minority as well.

Therefore, since a democracy cannot exist without minorities, their rights must be carefully protected. Unfortunately, many democracies have not always respected this principle. At this point, terror is used to controlling them. Acts of violence and forms of terror speed up across the nation and the fear so instilled in the minds of the citizens coerce them to comply with the ideology.

Controlling citizens is important for the totalitarian regime to achieve its set objective. Totalitarian regimes do not tolerate dissenting or even alternative views.

Those who promote such views are usually dealt with very harshly. There is little independent media in a totalitarian state; every TV channel, radio station, and newspaper is merely a state mouthpiece used to further indoctrinate society. There are no elections since opposing views are illegal. Such regimes also control all means of communication. Emails, letters, and phone calls, for example, are closely monitored so that opposition can be wiped out before it spreads.

An unregulated economy is a danger to totalitarian power, so every aspect of the state economy is planned. Farmers are told how much of and which crop to plant, while private enterprise if it exists at all, is very closely regulated to suit the needs of the state. This impacts the economy positively since everything is planned and the resources are utilized accordingly. Totalitarianism envisages a goal and makes all possible attempts to accomplish it.

This keeps their economy growing and the nation progressing. These governments take up small problematic sectors and try to fix the issues.

This helps them resolve all the discrepancies efficiently and effectively. When the goal is determined, all the policies and rules that the government comes up with deals with the attainment of such goals. Thus, swift and quick progress is witnessed. This regime also does not allow opposite views to thrive. This ensures that there are no hurdles in the accomplishment of the set goals and there is also no delay in doing so. This not only develops the country but also increases the standard of living of the citizens.

Like mentioned earlier, the advantages can also have a disadvantage. The very regime of setting up goals and achieving it has a negative side. While setting up targets and achieving them makes the country grow, it leaves its citizens with no privacy. In order to achieve the set goals, the totalitarian government adopts measures and policies that control the private and personal life of the citizens. They do not give any freedom of choice to the citizens and if they try to voice their opinions against the government, they are suppressed by terror.

Such governments also do not give any kind of freedom to its press and media by monitoring all its content. If the government finds any content that is inappropriate against them , they are not allowed to run that content over the television. Citizens in these countries do not have any choice and all their private and personal decisions are subject to the hindrances of the government.

Every form of governance is unique to its own self. Each one of them has their own sets of glories and pitfalls. The point to be accounted for is, the weightage and the extent of the pros and cons of each form so as to understand which is a better form of government.

It is crucial to know which form of government is better. To start with, let us come to terms with the fact that none of the two discussed above is perfect, and adopting either will have a certain kind of negative impact. So now, if the pros and cons of both the forms are considered, the choice between freedom of the citizens along with non-hindrance in their private life and growth of the country along with its development has to be considered. The question now stands, which one ways more- privacy and freedom of citizens or growth and development of the country?

While the time-taking decision mechanism is not that big an issue, hindrance in the private life of its citizens is. On one hand, a democratic form of distribution of powers can ensure effective decisions and on the other hand, the policy of adopting a certain target and achieving it can ensure better and faster progress of the country. If we analyze the characteristics of both the forms, we can see that a democracy with a little change can deliver the privacy and freedom of citizens along with the growth and development of the country.

For this, it has to adopt two of the characteristics of the totalitarian regime, that is- the attainment of a goal and a planned economy as described in this article. But, this adoption should not be rigid, it should have a more liberal approach. In this way, the citizens will also be happy and the country will also progress.

Goals can be achieved through effective legislation. Democracy is capable of producing such effective legislation with its feature of decentralization of powers. The local bodies can identify the problems persisting in their jurisdiction and come up with solutions accordingly.

Such solutions can be monitored and altered by the Central government from time to time. Further, if the top authorities feel that the issue needs more attention, it can step in and regulate. In this way, citizens are also happy and the country all climbs the ladder of progress. Thus, the suggestion would be to adopt democracy along with these certain features of totalitarianism to make the system of governance efficient and effective.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:. Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Check your mailbox for the joining link. From Bhawna Agarwal: [email protected]. Sign in. Password recovery. Forgot your password? Get help. Home Government Democracy v.

Totalitarianism : a suggestive approach. The problems are side effects of how it has been implemented, but not of the College itself. For example, if the president had all the power over everyone they would be able to do whatever they want and make laws that maybe no one agrees with. Next, if the power is divided and shared between people, then there will be a strong central government.

John Madison presented this idea. When there is a strong central government then it means that the government would have a strong middle, which can guard against tyranny because it keeps the government successful and strong. He has improved our government in multiple ways. Two of my favorite things are sending higher officials to check on the local officials and how he outlawed private wars.

Our government does not copy our neighbors ', but is an example to them. Pericles believed in involving all of the population in government decisions, leading to a time of prosperity. This seems deceptive because the people of that state vote for their party, not the opposing side. However, as seen multiple times in history, representatives have voted against their party.

It is with these reasons that I support the Electoral College and do not think that it should be modified nor abolished. Dystopian novels get rid of science and technology in order to control a society and take away individualism. In modern society, technology and science help create innovation that better the lives of people nationally and globally. These innovations make us less dependent on governmental rules and regulation.

This is one of the main reasons they are not seen in dystopias. Monroe found it gratifying to be elected President in such a time of peace and unity among the people; a state that he intended to promote throughout his time in office.

He encouraged the people to continue on their path, which would hopefully lead to more success as a nation. President Monroe then ended his speech by thanking his predecessors for their examples and asking God to continue providing His protection over the country.

I think that President Monroe did a very good job with his address, because it captured the feeling of national pride that was thriving at that time. He never really put much thought into his decisions except for the fact of was he going to be liked. This is the third and final most important reason on why he signing of the Civil Rights Act was based purely on politics.