Why crysis 3 is bad

This is just unacceptable. Hopefully this will be fixed soon. And if it really is ropes causing this issue, oy vey.

Thats exactly where i've stopped playing it The BUT when that happens.. My direct x dignostic tool says i hv direct x 11 but when i start the game it shows "error- use direct x 11 support GPU" : Plz Help Me.. Cheapest price for Crysis 3. I am running an Asus G53 with first gen gear. How do you think my rig will withstand under the load of high res textures when they are released for us for Crysis 3? In Graphics. And the dam scene is not really a problem.

I have it GeForce Experience optimal running Also I have SLI disabled in profile. I am seeing 30MB memory usage on card 0, MB on card 1. Card 0 runs at mid 50 celsius, card 1 at low 70 celsius. My Specs are: Q 3. Its either you messed up with your system config settings or bad hadrware you have..

Or pirated softwares.. Because I have no issues at all :. I'm running this game just fine on a single GTX I got Crysis 3 for 5 USD.

It's not bad. Crysis totally worth a price on sale I mean not a full one so I say "yay". I love the campaign it is a bit too short and multi is really variated.

Got it for 14 dollars and was worth it. It is on Origin, that is overpriced in itself. Displaying 1 to 15 of 15 results. Sign in through Steam to add a comment. Powered by Steam. Steam Group. Had tools like Riva Tuner Statistics Server been available then, the chances are we would have seen more tweaks to texture settings and fewer complaints online.

But Crysis also hails from an era where the future of CPU technology was heading in a very different direction than Crytek may have originally envisaged. It is multi-core aware to a certain extent - gaming workloads can be seen across four threads - but the expectation for PC computing, especially from Intel with its Netburst architecture, was that the real increase in speed in computing would happen from massive increases in clock speed, with the expectations of anything up to 8GHz Pentiums in the future.

It never happened, of course, and that's the key reason why it is impossible to run Crysis at 60fps, even on a Core i7 K overclocked to 5GHz. At its nadir in the Ascension stage sensibly removed from the console versions , the fastest gaming CPU money can buy struggles to move beyond the mids. In intense, physics-driven firefights with a lot of enemy AI, you can also expect frame-rates to struggle.

The Intel chip keeps you north of 60fps a lot of the time, but we were surprised to see how much the new Ryzen 7 X struggles to maintain 60fps in the heavier scenes - even with its XFR tech working exactly as it should, propelling the active cores to a max 4.

And it's here where the case for a proper Crysis remaster can start to be made. In fact, it already has been made - it was just never released for PC, instead arriving on Xbox and PlayStation 3.

There are many, many cutbacks to the game though it does retain parallax occlusion mapping and many other effects more suited to the current generation and performance - to be frank - can be terrible. But it arrived after the more console-friendly Crysis 2, and the jobs-based CPU scheduling - which spreads tasks across Xbox 's six threads and PS3's six available SPUs - would surely provide a revelatory increase in speed on modern PCs. In an ideal world, we'd love to see a Crysis Trilogy remaster or even a remake with all-new assets.

However, the CryEngine of that era was built with multi-platform development in mind. The idea of this version existing but not being available has been hugely frustrating for us across the years.

The PC Crysis games have always had scalability, especially with a target performance in 30fps territory. Here are our attempts to run the entire trilogy at 4K on a GTX Yes, Crytek's extravagance with GPU resources means that some nips and tucks are required to run the game maxed on Ti-level GPUs at 4K60 - but by and large, graphics-wise, we're there.

But owing to the more single-threaded nature of the CPU side of the equation, a locked 60fps Crysis experience will likely never happen, unless a port to a more modern CryEngine eventually appears. And the fact that the franchise has been left to rot generally is also upsetting, because we can see from the latest CryEngine just how stunning an entirely new Crysis could be. It starts with vegetation, a signature element of the classic Crysis experience.

Take a look at Ryse or more recently, Kingdom Come Deliverance and you'll see lush environments with much more accurate shadowing and denser placement, really communicating that 'jungle feel'. Lighting in the latest CryEngine can look simply beautiful and the most recent version features a form of sparse voxel octree global illumination, where the world objects are represented in a simplified form by a voxel grid, so expensive indirect lighting and shadowing maths can be done more quickly.

In this case, it supports large scale ambient occlusion and secondary light bounces that update in real time.

So you can imagine all the indirect lighting in some theoretical future Crysis jungle, where breaking down trees would also change colour, tonality and the direction of indirect lighting in that scene.

The technology is there, and the reputation of the franchise - despite the reception to Crysis 2 and its sequel - remains untarnished. This is a series that still defines the state of the art even now, and despite its PC roots, it would be a game that could make one hell of an impact as a launch title, heralding the arrival of a new console generation. But just a PC release of the last-gen console ports could see a resurgence of interest in this remarkable game, lowering the GPU threshold and potentially removing the CPU-bound limitations that plague the game until this day.

Ten years on, Crysis remains a hugely influential title - and to be frank, a brilliant game. We hope to see its return one day. Buy Crysis from Amazon [? We want to make Eurogamer better, and that means better for our readers - not for algorithms.

You can help! One of the best Completed the game 3 times less violent than call of duty ghosts and battlefield 4. Contains infrequent use of spam words like f and sh-t. This review Helped me decide. Had useful details. Read my mind 1. Report this review.

Teen, 16 years old Written by Arif mm October 20, Read my mind. Teen, 14 years old Written by Gamersnews32 May 16, Call of Duty type game that is slightly fine for kids Though the game may seem gritty, it isn't as bad compared to Call of Duty or other first person shooters.

There is blood violence but no gore or bloodstains are really present. You can stab enemies in the neck cinematically, blood sometimes pours out of enemies. Strong language is sometimes frequent; f-words and s-words. Teen, 14 years old Written by EnglishPenguin May 10, Expansive somewhat hard game contains perhaps the best ingame graphics ever. I came across crysis 3 during the monthly games with gold deals, and was surprised by how enjoyable the game was despite CMS's less then great review.

I have played a medium portion of crysis 2 CMS gave it five stars and enjoyed the third game considerable more. One great update I noticed was the bow if it is also in c2 I apologize for the misunderstanding You got this ultra modern super soldier who uses a this super sneaky bow. The gameplay is hard, but not too hard.